Other
impacts include major reductions in corn exports; reducing corn
use in livestock rations by 33 percent; and a major impact on
the pork and poultry industries. The authors also discuss
the expansion of ethanol production on trade, agricultural policy,
and other segments of the agricultural and domestic economy.
Bottom line, we are in an exciting time and a time of potential
change. The impact of biofuels on agricultural life as we
have known it is rapidly changing. Whether the assumption
used in this economic study will prove to be accurate will be somewhat
dependant on governmental policy decisions. The changes outlined
in this study could be greatly impacted by the public demand for
biofuels and tax policy required for their production. The
researchers conclude their paper by indicating that they are continuing
to address the policy question whether the positives associated
with the expansion of corn-based ethanol production are sufficient
to overcome some of the negative impacts.
Amani Elobeid, Simia Tokgoz, Dermot J. Hayes, Bruce A. Babcock
and Chad E. Hart. 2006. The long-run impact of corn-based
ethanol on the grain, oilseed, and livestock sectors: A preliminary
assessment. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development
(CARD) Briefing paper 06-BP-49. (The paper is also available
at www.card.iastate.edu ).
Importance of Aquaculture:
A new Food & Agriculture Organization (FAO) report indicated
that nearly half of the fish consumed are raised on farms rather
than caught in the wild. Nine
percent of the fish consumed in 1980 came from aquaculture, whereas today 43
percent of the fish consumed are farm raised. Farm-raised fish total 45.5
million metric tons while the marine fishing industry accounted for about 60
mmt annually. Marine industries wild fish capture has been relative stable
since mid-1980. The FAO report indicated that wild catches have little
chance of significantly increasing in the future. The report indicated
that world production of fish meal has also stabilized at 6-7 mmt since mid-1080. The
challenge is how do we continue to expand the world’s consumption of fish,
which depends on fish farming and efficient feed formulations with a limited
supply of fish meal. The partial answer is greater use of soybean meal
in diets of fish raised in captivity. The future is indeed bright for greater
use of soybean meal in highly efficient aquaculture operations.
The state of world aquaculture 2006. A report developed by
the FAO’s Sub-committee on Aquaculture and presented at the
New Delhi, India meeting held September 4-8, 2006.
Soybean Compositional Studies
Degussa Corporation has developed a new database for amino
acids found in feedstuffs as a service for their customers worldwide. The
company’s newsletter contains a chart showing the lysine content
of 775 samples of soybean meal. The lysine values were plotted
to show the relationship of lysine to crude protein. They reported
that the percent lysine could be estimated from soybean meal’s
crude protein levels with the following formula; (lysine=0.0679 x
crude protein – 0.328). The correlation coefficient for
estimating lysine from crude protein is 0.85, indicating that realistic
estimates of lysine can be estimated from soybean meal’s crude
protein levels.
The researchers compared regression curves for lysine content in soybean meal
from 2006 and 1996. The slope of the data regression curves was similar
and reflected lower levels of lysine in the 2006 soybean meal samples. The
researchers suggested that it is important to modify regression equations to
take into account the changes in amino acid contents of ingredients with time.
Johann Fickler. 2006. Feed your matrix-The new Degussa
AMINODatâ 3.0. AminoNewsä 7(2):
1-4. (July 2006).
In another paper, they reported the result of 775 samples of
soybean meal collected worldwide. Averages and standard deviations
for crude protein, lysine and methionine were reported form soybean
meal samples collected from Argentina, Brazil, China, India and the
United States. They reported small non-significant differences
in averages for these nutrients by country of meal origin due to
the relatively large standard deviations for these average values. They
found that soybean meal samples from most countries contained between
46 and 47% crude protein. Meal samples from Brazil and U.S.
contained 47.6 and 47.3%, respectively. Whereas, meal samples
from Argentina were found to contain below 45% crude protein. Lysine
and methionine levels of soybean meals produced in the U.S. were
higher than meals produced in the other countries, however, due to
wide variation in the meals, these values were not statistically
significant. One of the most interesting tables was comparing
average values for six essential amino acids reported in their 1996,
2001 and 2006 databases. In the new soybean meal data,
a slightly higher level of lysine and threonine was reported, whereas
methionine, methionine plus cysteine, tryptophan, arginine, isoleucine,
leucine and value were essentially similar to the 2001 database values. When
the new values were compared to those in the 1996 database; a trend
towards lower amino acid concentration was observed. The author
concluded that precise information on nutrient levels in feedstuffs
is needed for profitable animal and poultry production.
Johann Fickler. 2006. Feed your matrix: New amino
acid data for soybean meal. AminoNewsä 7(2):
5-10. (July 2006).
|