| Use
of Distiller Dried Grains with Solubles for Swine
A total of 482 pigs were used in an experiment to determine the effects
of distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) on the performance of
2.9 kg pigs. The pigs were allotted to either a control diet (64.5%
corn, 30.4% SBM and no DDGS) or an experimental diet (56.05% corn, 29.05%
SBM and 10% DDGS). Results of the 22-day study indicated the pigs fed
the control diet had slightly higher average daily gains (0.95 vs. 0.88
lbs/day), ate slightly more feed (1.50 vs. 1.55 lbs/day) and a slightly
lower feed per gain ration (1.50 vs. 1.55). The research group calculated
feed costs at three different DDGS costs. They indicated that the slight
reduction in gain and the lack of advantage in feed cost per pound gain,
reduced the margin over feed cost for the pigs fed the DDGS diet. In
this study, feed costs per pound of gain were similar for the two treatments
when DDGS were priced at $80/ton.
Linneen, S.K. 2006. Effects of distillers dried grains with solubles
on nursery pig performance. Kansas State University Swine Report. Pages
100-102.
Three experiments were conducted to determine the effects of feeding
DDGS to growing-finishing pigs. In the first experiment, 1,050 pigs
weighing 104.9 lbs were fed diets containing 0 or 15% DDGS, or 0, 3
or 6% added fat. The results indicated no interactions between DDGS
and added fat; linear improvement (P<0.01) in ADG and F/G with increasing
additions of fat; and no performance differences by including 15% DDGS
in the diet.
In the second study, 1,038 pigs were fed diets containing 0, 10, 20,
or 30% DDGS for 56-days. Results showed a trend for reduced gain (P<0.10)
and average daily feed intake (P<0.06) as the DDGS was increased
in the diet. Most of the reduction occurred in the pigs fed over 10%
DDGS.
The third study was to evaluate the diet preference. The pigs were provide
a choice of four feeders containing either a (67.05% corn, 30.05% SBM,
0% DDGS); (59.0% corn, 28.4% SBM, 10% DDGS); (50.85% corn, 26.8% SBM,
20% DDGS); or a (42.75% corn, 25.2% SBM, 30% DDGS) feed. They found
a significant decrease (P<0.01) in average daily feed intake as DDGS
were increased in the feed formulation. The researchers indicated that
the pigs preferred feeds without DDGS compared to feed containing DDGS.
The researchers summarized the three studies by stating that if a producer
or feed mill can obtain a DDGS source from a single ethanol plant that
has been shown not to affect feed intake, data from these trials indicate
that up to 10-15% DDGS could be included in swine growing-finishing
feeds. Note-It is interesting that in the finishing
feed that was used in the third experiment, 10% DDGS replaced 8.05%
of the corn and 1.65% of the SBM in the feed. The higher protein content
of DDGS replaced some of the need for SBM, however, as can be seen the
DDGS had a much greater impact on the corn need in the finishing ration.
In the diets containing DDGS, SBM still made up 28.4% of the ration
and contributed greatly to meeting the feed’s amino acid specifications.
Linneen, S.K. and co-workers. 2006. Effects of dried distillers
grains with solubles on growing-finishing pig performance. Kansas State
University Swine Report. Pages 103-110.
Performance of Genetic Modified Soybean Meal in Trout Diets
Japanese researchers investigated the use of genetically modified (GM)
soybean meal in trout diets. A GM defatted soybean meal was compared
to a regular soybean meal fed at two levels (15 and 30%) in a 42% protein
diet fed to juvenile trout (48.3 g) for 12 weeks. The results showed
no significant differences in growth or feed performance between the
two soybean meal sources. Promoter fragments were detected in muscle
of fish fed the GM soybean meal, however, these fragments were not detected
after five days on the non-genetically modified meal diet. Note-These
research results are another example showing that the nutritional value
of protein in GM soybean meal is similar to non-GM soybean meal.
Chainark, P. and co-workers. 2006. Availability of genetically modified
soybean meal in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) diets. Fisheries
Sci. 72(5): 1072-1078.
|