Improving Pig Performance in Low Protein Diets

The effect of reducing the protein level in diets of growing pigs has shown no major detrimental effect on growth performance or nitrogen retention, while reducing nitrogen excretion, in experiments where amino acids levels are equalized between treatments. In these low-protein diets with supplemental amino acids there is a trend for fatter carcasses. The author of this article indicates that the lowering of crude protein levels is also accomplished by more efficient utilization of energy, due to a significant reduction in heat production and energy loss in urine. This results in a greater quantity of retained energy in the low protein diets at identical digestible or metabolizable energy intakes. The net energy system is able to take this effect into account. The net energy values provided the closest estimate of the energy available for maintenance and production. The superiority of the net energy system for predicting performance and carcass quality has been confirmed when low protein diets are fed.

The metabolizable energy content of corn and soybean meal is similar (3,650 kcal/kg), whereas the net energy content of corn is significantly higher (2,970 versus 1,930 kcal/kg) compared to soybean meal. Therefore, in a corn-soybean meal diet, reducing the ration crude protein content by two percent results an increase of the net energy by two percent.

The practical value of using net energy values is more accuracy in predicting pig performance and carcass quality. Rations formulated using the digestible energy or metabolizable energy systems systematically over-estimate the energy content of protein-or fiber-rich feeds and underestimates the energy value of starch- or fat-rich feed ingredients. Diets formulated using net energy values are characterized by lower crude protein levels, higher need for supplementing with amino acids, and reduced ingredient costs.

Rademacher, Meike. 2004. Net energy system may have benefits for performance. Feedstuffs, January 26, p13, 34-35.


Previous Page




Back to the Soybean Meal INFOsource
HOME

© 2001 Iowa Soybean Association