Soybean Meal Composition Studies
A study was undertaken at North Carolina State University to
identify soybean meal’s nutritional characteristics desired by
swine nutritionists. Specifically, the research was designed to evaluate
compositional variation in experimental and commercial soybean varieties
and whether these compositional differences were large enough to be
nutritionally or environmentally important to the swine nutritionists.
In a study reported in 2002, the digestibility of soybean meal was found
to be relatively uniform across the U.S. and Netherlands. This lack
of variability was attributed to minimal genetic variation in nutritional
traits in commercial soybean cultivars and to uniform meal processing
conditions. This study was designed to expand these research investigations
and to evaluate experimental soybean germplasm lines with unique traits.
Seventy-two soybean samples were analyzed for crude protein (CP), neutral
detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and in vitro dry matter
(DM) digestibility. Based on the variation found, eight samples (five
genetically modified lines and three commercial varieties) were selected
for testing. The eight soybean sources were sent to the Texas A&M
Oilseed Processing Laboratory to be processed into meal using carefully
controlled uniform processing conditions. The pilot-plant solvent-extracted
meals were analyzed for moisture, crude fat, crude protein, crude fiber,
ash, urease activity, trypsin inhibitor, protein dispersibility, phytate
phosphorus and oligosaccharides using officially accepted methods.
A Latin square designed study with eight pigs and eight diets was used
for the ileal digestibility experiments. The sixteen-percent crude protein
experimental diets were formulated with soybean meal as the only protein
source. Soybean meal levels in the diets ranged from 31-34 percent.
Feed and freeze-dried ileal digesta were analyzed for the chromic oxide
marker, amino acids and dry matter.
In another experiment, the total track digestion was determined using
five soybean meals, ten crossbred barrows and a 5x5 Latin square designed
study. Urine and feces were collected, stored and evaluated for gross
energy, nitrogen and odor characteristics. Using data from the two trials,
the researchers calculated fermentation rates for CP and DM based on
actual ileal digestibilities of the feed ingredients and total tract
digestibilities of the complete diet.
Results indicated that the 72 soybean samples was fairly uniform; the
coefficients of variation (CV) for CP, NDF and ADF were 3.6, 7.4 and
8.8%, respectively. However, the researchers were successful in selecting
eight soybean samples with a higher CV for ADF (26%), but were not successful
increasing the CV for CP (3.7%). The ranges of values were: CP, 48.2-53.1%;
CF, 2.6-5.6%; NDF, 5.8-9.2%, ADF, 2.6-5.0%; hemicellulose, 3.1-4.7%;
raffinosis, 0.15-1.22% and stachyose, 0.28-5.93%. These data suggest
that important composition differences exist between different soybean
germplasm lines. These differences may have an impact on the meal’s
nutritional value. These results also indicate that the variations in
protein levels in soybean lines are relatively small and processing
does not increase the amount of variation in the meal produced.
Several correlations were found between the meal components. The CP
content of the meal was negatively correlated with fiber (r= -0.70,
P=0.05), raffinose (r= -0.90, P<0.01), and stachyose (r= -0.96, P<0.01).
Trypsin inhibitor, urease value and protein dispersion index were all
correlated (r= -0.63 to -0.83) indicating processing had a similar effect
on all of these meal components.
The researchers reported differences up to 6% in ileal DM digestibilities
and 8% in ileal CP digestibilities. These differences were reduced to
1.1% for total tract DM digestibility and 4% for total tract CP digestibilities
by further break down of the materials in the lower digestive track.
Ileal digestibilities of the eight soybean meals ranged from 79.6 to
83.2% and were highly correlated with energy digestibility (r= 0.91,
P<0.05). Crude protein ileal digestibilities ranged from 80.6 to
84.6% and were not correlated with DM digestibility. It should be noted
that the apparent ileal digestibilities for CP and lysine, methionine
and threonine were highly correlated (r>0.96, P<0.01). Protein
dispersibility index, trypsin inhibitor and urease levels had little
impact on digestibilities in this study.
Stachyose was the only composition trait that had a significant impact
on ideal digestion. Stachyose had a negative correlation with ileal
DM (r= -0.80, P=0.02) and energy (r= -0.73, P=0.04) digestibilities.
Negative correlations were also reported for hemicellulose and oligosaccharides,
but the researchers attributed the effects to stachyose. These observations
were similar to several poultry studies showing that soy oligosaccharides
reduce energy digestibility. Stachyose was not significantly correlated
with ileal CP digestibility (r=-0.28, P=0.50), suggesting that stachyose
may not be a major factor in protein digestion in practical corn-soybean
meal swine diets.
Small differences were observed in total tract digestibilities between
the five soybean meal samples. Ranges for total tract digestibilities
of DM (87.9-88.9%), energy (86.5-87.7%), and CP (84.4-87.5%) were reported.
These data indicate that fermentation in the large intestine minimizes
meal treatment differences.
Manure and urine samples were analyzed for odor components. The results
of these analyses showed a lot of variation. No clear-cut differences
between meals were reported. As expected, some soybean meal components
were directly related to levels of manure odorants. More research is
needed to clarify compositional changes needed in soybeans to minimize
swine odors.
The researchers conclude that there is variation in the soybean genetic
base that could be used in soybean breeding programs to develop varieties
with greater potential nutritional and environmental benefits to the
swine nutritionist. The key trait seems to be stachyose; reduced stachyose
levels in meal would result in increased ileal energy digestibility
of the soybean meal. No composition trait was identified in this study
that explains the differences in ileal CP digestibilities important
to both maximizing the nutritional value of the meal and possibly reducing
ammonia and odor emissions.
Van Kempen, T.A. and co-workers. 2006. Selecting soybean
meal characteristics preferred for swine nutrition. J. Animal Sci. 84(6):
1387-1395. |